Retour à l'accueil
   
 
General presentation
 
 
Scientific Committee
 
 
Credits
 
 
Conference proceedings
 
 
Conference archives
 

15a - Liebal, K (Leipzig) , Pika, S (St Andrews)

Session : Primates

15a - Liebal, K, Pika, S “Gestural Communication in nonhuman primates : a comparison across different species of apes”

Mercredi 15 juin- 15h00-16h00
(Salle F05)


-  Liebal, Katja (Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig)
-  Pika, Simone (University of St. Andrews, St Andrews)

Gestural communication in great apes

Studies of animal communication systems are essential to understand the evolution of human language. The majority of research focused on vocal communication (e.g., Seyfarth 1987), which is mainly due to the analogy to human language. Recent studies however, provide evidence that gestural signaling plays an important role in the communication of nonhuman primates (Goodall, 1986 ; Maestripieri 1996, 1999 ; Tomasello, Call et al. 1994, 1997) and emphasize that gestures may be the thread of evolutionary continuity between animal communication and human language. Our presentation summarizes and compares recent experimental and behavioral studies on the gestural communication of great apes (bonobos / Pan paniscus, chimpanzees / Pan troglodytes, gorillas / Gorilla gorilla, as well as orangutans / Pongo pygmaeus). The aim was to investigate systematically the gestural repertoire of the different species based on a similar design of data collection and analysis. We focused especially on intentionally produced gestures. This means only those signals were included in the analysis, which appeared to transfer a communicative message, e.g. a request and/or a desired action/event (e.g., play, nurse or ride) and were accompanied by the following criteria : gazing at the recipient with or without waiting after the signal had been produced and persisting in the communicative interaction. Our goal was to (1) compile the general gestural repertoire of each species including different signal categories (auditory, tactile and visual gestures), (2) to investigate the individual variability of this repertoire to determine the main learning process involved, and (3) to investigate the use of gestures in terms of fl exibility and audience effects (Tomasello, 1994, 1997). The results are used to draw within and between species comparison and to discuss the results within the framework of the evolution of gestural communication along with the social structure, ecology, and social-cognitive abilities of the different species