|
|
50 -Burgoon J., Qin T., Dunbar N., Afifi W., White C., Buller,D
Session :
50 - Burgoon J., Qin T., Dunbar N., Afifi W., White C., Buller, D : “Nonverbal and Verbal Indicators of Truth and Deceit in Interpersonal Interactions”
jeudi 16 juin- 15h00-15h30
(Amphithéâtre)
Burgoon, Judee K.
(Human Communication Research, Center for the Management of
Information, University of Arizona, Tucson)
Qin, Tiantian
(Department of Management Information Systems, University of Arizona,Tucson)
Dunbar, Norah E.
Department of Communication Studies, Long Beach
Afifi, Walid A.
(Department of Communication, Pennsylvania State University)
White, Cindy H.
(Department of Communication, University of Colorado, Boulder)
Buller, David B.
Klein Buendel, Inc., Denver, Colorado
Nonverbal and Verbal Indicators of Truth and Deceit in Interpersonal Interactions
In interpersonal interactions, people must implicitly assess whether
the messages of others are to be trusted. Research on reliable
indicators of deception has (1) been primarily noninteractive, (2)
looked at verbal or nonverbal cues independently, (3) not considered
temporal changes, and (4) not considered how deceivers adapt
their displays in response to interlocutor actions. In the experiment
to be reported, participants conduct interviews during which interviewees
alternate between giving deceptive and truthful responses
across 12 questions. Numerous kinesic and proxemic gestures are
coded by trained raters, verbal indicators are machine coded, and
temporal and adaptation patterns are analyzed. Results show differences
within and between interviewees in nonverbal immediacy,
number of illustrator and adaptor gestures, nonverbal and verbal
involvement, and adherence to Gricean principles for cooperative
discourse. Convergence between deceptive and truthful patterns over
time reveals how communicators parlay initial interaction diffi culties
into successful performances through integration of nonverbal and
verbal actions. Reciprocal versus compensatory responses to interviewer
involvement patterns also reveal responsivity to the interlocutor.
Results cast doubts on claims derived from noninteractive
experiments, results from experiments utilizing very brief behavioral
samples, and experiments that examine limited subsets of nonverbal
or verbal behaviors.
|
|
|